Good advice I'd say. Personally, I'd like to see more discussion of "you know what", but more reason flavored and less "one true way" flavored. If it has to be "one true way" flavored, then yea, stick to physics.
On that subject I'd be interested in having a better understanding of gravity. I can't quite get my mind around what it is.
"Some have argued that claims about the existence of a ‘multiverse’ is not very different than a religious belief in a deity. One of the things that differentiates the two is that we might be able to get evidence, albeit indirect, about the existence of a multiverse."
We MIGHT be able to get evidence of all kinds of things as yet unknown to science.
Perfect! You are in your element. Write more about physics and less about you know what.
Good advice I'd say. Personally, I'd like to see more discussion of "you know what", but more reason flavored and less "one true way" flavored. If it has to be "one true way" flavored, then yea, stick to physics.
On that subject I'd be interested in having a better understanding of gravity. I can't quite get my mind around what it is.
"Macavity, Macavity, there’s no one like Macavity,
He’s broken every human law, he breaks the law of gravity.
His powers of levitation would make a fakir stare,
And when you reach the scene of crime—Macavity’s not there!"
T.S. Eliot
You write...
"Some have argued that claims about the existence of a ‘multiverse’ is not very different than a religious belief in a deity. One of the things that differentiates the two is that we might be able to get evidence, albeit indirect, about the existence of a multiverse."
We MIGHT be able to get evidence of all kinds of things as yet unknown to science.