Before you throw me to the wayside, please bear the real circumstances here:
The (1-page) paper demonstrates use of the scientific method to FALSIFY the assumption π = 3.14159... (yes, you read that correctly, FALSIFY) which can be geometrically proven to merely reference a radius of ONLY (up-to) 0.49952094... and NOT 0.5000... as assumed.
The falsification is a product of a scientific theory of human suffering I've been working on for over 5 years. This is critical, Lawrence: please be conscious about the implications (over 2000 years of human ignorance contained in a single measure).
again.. if you think it is important, submit it to a journal.. I am sorry, but I get so many people sending me things.. I don't adjudicate.. journals will seek out a referee who will examine it in detail, or they will explain to you why it is wrong, if they think it is.
For public record: Lawrence Krauss has thrice refused to receive the most important falsification our suffering humanity could possibly perform. Despite all efforts to deliver a 1-page solution to this crisis, Krauss has elected to allow humanity to continue to suffer under the illusion of knowledge.
Such negligence should face a military tribunal, as Krauss' negligence merits. It is unconscionable he would be so careless & negligent to ignore something so important to the future of humanity.
The paper is a product of a scientific theory of human suffering which measures (for) the most deeply embedded false basic underlying assumption upon which science is operating.
The result can be verified in less than 24 hours - please help make this happen!
I want to see this planet get on the right track by learning the importance of the scientific method.
The Western education system is a joke. If an unaffiliated researcher working on a theory of human suffering can't publish a paper for public discovery (requires link) because they don't belong to an indoctrination centre "academic institution", Western science deserves to collapse. If someone falsifies a 2000-year-old assumption, how is belonging to an institution even relevant?
When will you be telling humanity we've had the wrong value of pi for over 2000 years? I'll bet you half your first week of book sales the result is absolutely correct.
They stated there are no mathematical errors or disputes with the result. Their only issue was institution info & I don't belong to one.
Are you just assuming the result is wrong with no foundation?
I can walk you or anyone step-by-step ways to falsify pi and/or solve for pi with exactitude (inverse square method, rotation method, collapse method etc.) but I am beginning to see this is about you not being wrong about something so fundamental.
How much do you really care about the problem of religion? Not enough to be willing to look at a single sheet of paper which would shake their foundations.
Will there be a digital edition (kindle)? I have no room for physical books anymore. Also, I can read easier on a backlit surface (AMD). I will make an exception if there is not going to be any, otherwise I will wait. Thanks
yes.. there will be a kindle edition.
Yes, I will be narrating.
yes
deal! thanks
thanks!
Before you throw me to the wayside, please bear the real circumstances here:
The (1-page) paper demonstrates use of the scientific method to FALSIFY the assumption π = 3.14159... (yes, you read that correctly, FALSIFY) which can be geometrically proven to merely reference a radius of ONLY (up-to) 0.49952094... and NOT 0.5000... as assumed.
The falsification is a product of a scientific theory of human suffering I've been working on for over 5 years. This is critical, Lawrence: please be conscious about the implications (over 2000 years of human ignorance contained in a single measure).
Humanity is measurably suffering on a common base of a deficient circle constant. https://jfmeyer.substack.com/p/on-a-proof-314159
Please Lawrence... don't let it be for "nothing".
again.. if you think it is important, submit it to a journal.. I am sorry, but I get so many people sending me things.. I don't adjudicate.. journals will seek out a referee who will examine it in detail, or they will explain to you why it is wrong, if they think it is.
For public record: Lawrence Krauss has thrice refused to receive the most important falsification our suffering humanity could possibly perform. Despite all efforts to deliver a 1-page solution to this crisis, Krauss has elected to allow humanity to continue to suffer under the illusion of knowledge.
Such negligence should face a military tribunal, as Krauss' negligence merits. It is unconscionable he would be so careless & negligent to ignore something so important to the future of humanity.
Hi Lawrence,
Can you please take a look at this 1-page proof?
https://open.substack.com/pub/jfmeyer/p/on-a-proof-314159?r=1x9643&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
The paper is a product of a scientific theory of human suffering which measures (for) the most deeply embedded false basic underlying assumption upon which science is operating.
The result can be verified in less than 24 hours - please help make this happen!
I want to see this planet get on the right track by learning the importance of the scientific method.
I will tell you what I tell others who send me unsolicited papers.. submit it to a journal and get a referees report.. Best. LMK
Be fair Krauss - I did exactly what you said.
Referees report(s): the result is a valid proof and the paper is published:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4307169
Therefore π ≠ 3.14159... Krauss.
That's a measure of human ignorance.
The "religion" problem is on a base of this.
The Western education system is a joke. If an unaffiliated researcher working on a theory of human suffering can't publish a paper for public discovery (requires link) because they don't belong to an indoctrination centre "academic institution", Western science deserves to collapse. If someone falsifies a 2000-year-old assumption, how is belonging to an institution even relevant?
When will you be telling humanity we've had the wrong value of pi for over 2000 years? I'll bet you half your first week of book sales the result is absolutely correct.
needs to be peer reviewed
It was.
They stated there are no mathematical errors or disputes with the result. Their only issue was institution info & I don't belong to one.
Are you just assuming the result is wrong with no foundation?
I can walk you or anyone step-by-step ways to falsify pi and/or solve for pi with exactitude (inverse square method, rotation method, collapse method etc.) but I am beginning to see this is about you not being wrong about something so fundamental.
How much do you really care about the problem of religion? Not enough to be willing to look at a single sheet of paper which would shake their foundations.
Will you be narrating this audiobook as well, Dr. Krauss? Loved the Physics of Climate Change one, it was like I was sitting in one of your classes 😂🙌
yes.. Thanks. :)
I just placed my order. Now I’ll need to see you next year in Phoenix to sign it.
ordered on Amazon, looking forward!
Thanks!
ordered on Amazon, looking forward Lawrence!
Any ideas when the audio book will be out?
on pub date.. pre order maybe before
Will there be a digital edition (kindle)? I have no room for physical books anymore. Also, I can read easier on a backlit surface (AMD). I will make an exception if there is not going to be any, otherwise I will wait. Thanks
Pre-ordered!