DEI victimism cannot withstand contact with reality. This is at least one strong part of the reason why its proponents so viciously attack nonconformity.
"The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
I wonder whether anyone would object to a statement affirming not to do things that are recognized as being illegal or immoral, etc, in the context of work. E.g. not sexually or otherwise harass, bully, undermine, discriminate, usurp, etc. It would be reminder not to do such things. In the end it would serve the purpose of meaningful DEI without the irrelevancy of statements.
An FYI possibly of interest to those here: recent podcast of Sam Harris with Yascha Mounk, and Mounk's recent book The Identity Trap (assuming you have not seen it).
DEI victimism cannot withstand contact with reality. This is at least one strong part of the reason why its proponents so viciously attack nonconformity.
"The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Thank you for speaking out sir.
I wonder whether anyone would object to a statement affirming not to do things that are recognized as being illegal or immoral, etc, in the context of work. E.g. not sexually or otherwise harass, bully, undermine, discriminate, usurp, etc. It would be reminder not to do such things. In the end it would serve the purpose of meaningful DEI without the irrelevancy of statements.
agreed
An FYI possibly of interest to those here: recent podcast of Sam Harris with Yascha Mounk, and Mounk's recent book The Identity Trap (assuming you have not seen it).