Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dallas E Weaver's avatar

If evolution is correct, people who believe in a deity and have to answer the question of when and how did their God intervene in the evolution of humanity. With no intervention, god would be irrelevant.

Was God responsible for allowing homo erectus and later homo sapiens to evolve a big energy burning brain to allow humanity to evolve past stone tools and fire to modern creation of wealth from "specialization and trade"? Or was the energetic payoff of "specialization and trade" large enough to evolutionary justify a brain that burns 20% of our metabolic energy (which doesn't require a god)? Obsidian is a lot better rock for stone tools and salt preserves meat but both rock and salt are not distributed uniformly over areas.

Some primate had a stranger with a hunk of obsidian enter his area and he didn't just steal his rock, as is typical for primates, but gave him food and shells to get more females and sent him back to get more rock. Meanwhile with a source of obsidian he got more females and could provide more food with less effort.

Maria Comninou's avatar

I did not go looking for trouble. You mentioned his Wikipedia page and I went there to find more about this important person. The page mentioned sexual harassment allegations and cited https://www.science.org/content/article/report-gives-details-sexual-harassment-allegations-felled-famed-geneticist. His behavior is all too common for people his age and I tolerated similar attitudes all my life in various contexts. But I was born in a macho society and it did not bother me much. Ayala's transgressions were comments and hands and kisses ( all too common in European cultures in the past) but he did not stop when he was admonished. He created an atmosphere discouraging women of today from science. And that is the only reason I mention it because I keep hearing from men that women are taking over the sciences.

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?